Sinthoras39@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoArch Linux vs. Manjaro Linuxmessage-squaremessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up118arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up112arrow-down1message-squareArch Linux vs. Manjaro LinuxSinthoras39@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square22fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareentropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoI use Mint, Arch (technically Asahi), Debian, Ubuntu, and I used to use Manjaro. They all have their places. Mint has the best UI/stable no-fuss desktop experience, for instance.
minus-squareKindaABigDyl@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoArch does not have a place though. It’s just a more buggy Arch with a worse maintaining team EDIT: Actually, tbh it’s incorrect to even call Manjaro Arch. That’s an insult to Arch
minus-squareShareni@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoDon’t forget that it’s repo has less packages and that they’re delayed by two weeks for absolutely no reason. Not only opening users to potential hacks, but also messing up AUR package installation. Manjaro is Arch’s glue eating cousin
minus-squareentropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year ago Arch … [is] just a more buggy Arch I know you meant to say Manjaro, but that’s a pretty funny take.
I use Mint, Arch (technically Asahi), Debian, Ubuntu, and I used to use Manjaro.
They all have their places. Mint has the best UI/stable no-fuss desktop experience, for instance.
Arch does not have a place though. It’s just a more buggy Arch with a worse maintaining team
EDIT: Actually, tbh it’s incorrect to even call Manjaro Arch. That’s an insult to Arch
Don’t forget that it’s repo has less packages and that they’re delayed by two weeks for absolutely no reason. Not only opening users to potential hacks, but also messing up AUR package installation.
Manjaro is Arch’s glue eating cousin
I know you meant to say Manjaro, but that’s a pretty funny take.
Oops lol
Leaving in