• Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why does the article call the people held by Israel “prisoners”, but the people held by Palestine “hostages”?

      • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The Israeli prisoners were detained and arrested.

        The Israelis held by Hamas have been given many more rights than the average Palestinian prisoner.

        This is an outright lie, Palestinians are being amputated because of zipties to their limbs

        Again, Israel has no interest in “rehabilitating” its hostages, whereas Hamas is specifically offering to release theirs.


        At worst this is hostages on both sides. Your assessment only proves how much more hospitable Hamas have been to its captives than Israel, even at a time of war and famine brought on by Israel’s onslaught.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Reuters still pushing Zionist propaganda 6 months in. Sad to see.

    We all know israel is the only party rejecting an actual permanent ceasefire.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Wars generally end when one side surrenders.

      Neither Israel nor Hamas wants to surrender, so there is no reason to expect a “permanent ceasefire”.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        There have been multiple previous wars between Hamas and israel, and other parties like Lebanon, and it usually ends in a ceasefire.

        Israel saying they want keep committing Genocide after a 6 week break and then occupy Gaza isn’t exactly a great deal.