• kaffiene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s not. It’s reflecting it’s training material. LLMs and other generative AI approaches lack a model of the world which is obvious on the mistakes they make.

      • Lmaydev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You could say our brain does the same. It just trains in real time and has much better hardware.

        What are we doing but applying things we’ve already learnt that are encoded in our neurons. They aren’t called neural networks for nothing

      • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Tabula rasa, piss and cum and saliva soaking into a mattress. It’s all training data and fallibility. Put it together and what have you got (bibbidy boppidy boo). You know what I’m saying?

          • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Okay, now you’re definitely protecting projecting poo-flicking, as I said literally nothing in my last comment. It was nonsense. But I bet you don’t think I’m an LLM.