• asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    In that situation I’m concerned about other drivers, and also the child not paying attention while staring at their phone. I have seen sooo many teens just step off the curb and walk across the street without even looking up from their phone. Stranger Danger would have nothing to do with it.

    There needs to be a better balance between the latch key kid independence/responsibility and the absolute lack of trust in your kids and your community to just not be child kidnapping murderers???

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The whole way our society is built is not around pedestrian safety or teaching it to children.

      My daughter is growing up in a subdivision with low traffic and no sidewalks and I have to regularly remind her to look both ways when crossing the streets when we’re elsewhere because it’s just not something she has to do all the time.

      There’s room for sidewalks, they just didn’t build them. If there were sidewalks, it would be far easier for her to remember to do it every time.

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Fixing transport infrastructure would have the most impact. Narrower roads with fewer lanes and more complexity, 20mph/30kmph speed limits, better designed pedestrian crossings, and separated bike and pedestrian infrastructure. And requiring the vehicles themselves to be designed such that they are not just safe for the occupants, but safe for other vehicles and people too (which means lower hood heights and lower weight).

      And in general, providing viable alternatives to driving so there are less vehicles on the road, making it safer to walk and bike.

      • daltotron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        but safe for other vehicles and people too (which means lower hood heights and lower weight).

        Small note on this, but better crash compatibility and an upper weight limit might also increase the relative safety of bicycles, motorcycles, and even potentially some larger local wildlife, on top of just increasing safety for pedestrians and people driving relatively smaller cars, like sedans.