• agarorn@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do you mean the income of 14 years, or the income you would get working 14 while years (which with a 40hour work week is more like 60 years of work)?

    • TheOneCurly@lemmy.theonecurly.page
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I took the amount I estimate I would need to retire right now at my current age and divided that by my current hourly rate. So it’s 124,594 working “man-hours”, as you say like 60 years of working. But that value goes down every year I do actually work and as my retirement investments grow.

      I assume OP asked it that way to normalize and anonymize it a little.

      • agarorn@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well good luck reaching that goal. However 60 years of work seems way to high.