@ernest how do I report a Magazin on kbin.social ? There is a usere called “ps” who is posting to his own “antiwoke” Magazin on kbin.social. Please remove this and dont give them a chance to etablish them self on kbin.social. When I report his stuff it will go to him because he is the moderator of the magazin? Seems like a problem. Screenshot of the “antiwoke” Magazin /sub on kbin.social. 4 Headlines are visible, 2 exampels: “Time to reject the extrem trans lobby harming our society” “How to end wokeness” #Moderation #kbin #kbin.social 📎

edit: dont feed the troll, im shure ernest will delet them all when he sees this. report and move on.

Edit 2 : Ernest responded:
“I just need a little more time. There will likely be a technical break announced tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. Along with the migration to new servers, we will be introducing new moderation tools that I am currently working on and testing (I had it planned for a bit later in my roadmap). Then, I will address your reports and handle them very seriously. I try my best to delete sensitive content, but with the current workload and ongoing relocation, it takes a lot of time. I am being extra cautious now. The regulations are quite general, and I would like to refine them together with you and do everything properly. For now, please make use of the option to block the magazine/author.”

  • AnonTwo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    Incidentally the person breaking the rules is making the biggest stir in this thread about not banning people.

    Guy literally is advocating beating people to death as a good Christian moral while also trying to advocate he shouldn’t be banned for it.

    • 10A@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, I did not advocate for beating people to death, and I would never advocate for that. Try reading the whole post and not taking a few words out of context.

      • AnonTwo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        The whole post was even more disgusting. Others are welcome to read it, Static linked it, but I stand by what I said.

        If the devil did exist, he resides in your church, raising monsters.

      • jonion@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        And these are the people who would lecture about prejudice… Nothing but prejudicial bad faith in this entire thread.

        Being a filthy reactionary, I was really hoping that the fediverse could become something like the reddit of 10 years ago, but it seems like the dyed-in-the-wool redditors couldn’t help but bring their intolerance with them.

        Thank you for actually bothering to stand your ground. God bless.

    • czech@faux.moe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      They will always advocate for blocking over banning because they can easily make new accounts to spread their hateful message. To block a user you must first read their message; their mission is accomplished.

      Should the community have to continually deal with this baggage so that hateful people can intentionally misinterpret what “free speech” means?