Dr. Angela Collier plays the Binding of Isaac: Rebirth and talks at length about what went wrong with string theory, and how that affected science communication.

  • interolivary@beehaw.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 years ago

    I didn’t see it as her being angry at the ones 40 years ago, but the ones who continued the hype even though it was obvious string theory wasn’t falsifiable

    • StringTheory@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      The ones who were human and were full of hubris and errors and didn’t want to give up their pet theory?

      Being angry at humans for being human is kinda futile. Humans have always done this, and always will.

      And the excited physicists didn’t destroy science communication any more than Stephen Jay Gould did. People can be wrong. People can cling to things they cherish and that they poured their heart and years of effort into.

      People are people, and this too shall pass.

      • jellyfish@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s also very human to commit murder; humans have always committed murder, and always will. That doesn’t mean I can’t be mad at someone for doing it…

        • StringTheory@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 years ago

          I think murder might be a leeeeeeeetle bit different than refusing to give up on a theory you worked on for 30 or 40 years.

          • jellyfish@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            2 years ago

            My point is that saying you can’t hold something against someone because it’s human nature isn’t a reasonable argument.

            • masterspace@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              It is if you don’t believe in free will, and as long as we’re talking physics, there is zero evidence of free will existing.

              In that context being mad at someone is only useful in so far as it influences future behaviour. In this case, it won’t, because she’s not actually angry in a way that anyone could use to help guide their own behaviour. What message do I take from her distracted rant? That Brian Greene is a self serving dingus? That self serving dinguses exist in every field? That every single string theory physicist is a lying asshole?

              It’s ironic that she’s complaining about people making science education hard when she’s actively distracting herself from making a more cohesive argument by playing a pointless video game.