Here’s a link to the news. https://e621.net/news_updates

Edit: As people in the comments pointed out, this bill targets all websites hosting porn. e621 just happens to be hosted in Arizona, and it therefore affects them directly.

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    92·
    9 months ago

    I’m pretty sure that viewing pornography can be harmful to young children.

    Not all “minors”, but some people forget that the phrase includes both 17 year olds and 4 year olds in some states…

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      93·
      9 months ago

      If a 4 year old is exposed to furry porn, I don’t think the culprit is the website.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        2·
        9 months ago

        I didn’t assign blame to the website, or to anything. I just said that viewing sexual material can be harmful to children.

        • Gabu@lemmy.ml
          5·
          9 months ago

          Which is the problem with completely open ended language, which is always used in such bills so as to only apply to whoever they want to persecute.