• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Private jets is a very small part of airplane pollution and four people travelling in a Chevy Suburban with a big V8 actually use less fuel per km per passenger than the big passenger airplanes use per km per passenger. That’s not even taking non CO2 pollution into consideration.

    People in general rely on airplanes way too much, may it be for personal travel or to get shit shipped to them ASAP, it’s not just a rich people issue.

    • ILikeCats@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      AI disagrees but yeah. We need more trains

      Private planes emit significantly more CO2 than passenger planes per passenger. Here’s why:

      • Fewer passengers: Private jets are designed to carry a small number of people, often just a handful. Passenger planes, on the other hand, can carry hundreds of passengers. This means the emissions from a private jet are spread out among far fewer people.
      • More frequent takeoffs and landings: Private jets often take off and land from smaller airports, which can mean shorter flights. Takeoff and landing are the most fuel-intensive parts of a flight, so these short trips contribute disproportionately to a private jet’s CO2 emissions.

      Studies estimate that private jets emit 5 to 14 times more CO2 per passenger compared to commercial airlines [Transport & Environment].

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Private planes emit significantly more CO2 than passenger planes per passenger.

        Read my message again, I never said they don’t. They still represent an insignificant proportion of air traffic emissions.