• Steve@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        For my own learning and understanding, why does it take that long for GNOME on Arch?

        • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Afaik they’re waiting for version xx.1 with bug fixes. Idk if GNOME is unstable in xx.0 and idk why it has such a special place on Arch but what I do know is that Plasma 6 is quite bad now with its 6.0.2

          • 1984@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Don’t think it’s bad? It seems to have been a great release with Plasma 6. Don’t have any issues myself and haven’t seen anything major. But maybe I missed it.

            • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              Idk about your hardware but on mine it’s not good. There were even full desktop crashes (the ones that make systemd boot log appear and only switching to a different session can make the system usable again). Btw I noticed issues on both Xorg and Wayland smh. Can’t remember them now though

          • aleph@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            The added benefit in the delay on Arch is that most maintained extensions will have already been made compatible by the time it hits the repos.