Ubuntu’s popularity often makes it the default choice for new Linux users. But there are tons of other Linux operating systems that deserve your attention. As such, I’ve highlighted some Ubuntu alternatives so you can choose based on your needs and requirements—because conformity is boring.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t think that’s particularly wrong, tbh.

      The key words being targeted at regular desktop users.

      Obviously far from being one of the first distros, or distros with a GUI. But targeted at regular desktop users - i.e. “normies”? Absolutely.

      People need to remember how crappy and janky the desktop was before Canonical spearheaded a lot of usability improvements.

      If only they had continued along that path :/

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        There were lots of distros that tried to target regular users before it. Mandrake/Conectiva/Mandriva, Corel, Mepis, Lindows, Linspire etc. just off the top of my head.

        Hell, Lindows came preinstalled on Walmart PCs at some point.

    • nooneshere@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Slackware is a garbage distro purely because it doesn’t have a functional package manager supporting dependency resolution

    • survivalmachine@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      targeted at regular desktop users

      While Slackware and Debian are the oldest still-maintained Linux distros, I don’t think either had a desktop-first approach.

      • Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I considered putting logos of some of the many more user-friendly pre-ubuntu distros in the meme but was lazy.

        Debian was intended to be for regular desktop users back then too, though.

        • Soleil@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          …Except Debian wasn’t even user-friendly when I used it two years after Ubuntu’s release. Red Hat Linux (not RHEL, which came later) was the only distro I’m aware of before Ubuntu that was more UX-focused.

          Edit: I forgot about a few others — SUSE, Corel Linux, Lindows/Linspire, and others. Buuuuuuut most of those distros don’t exist anymore. I still stand by that Debian didn’t used to be as noob-friendly as it is these days.

            • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              I really feel like you’re missing the idea of that sentence deliberately.

              What Linux distribution came before Ubuntu that was specifically designed to be user friendly for a non-technical user?

              • Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                What Linux distribution came before Ubuntu that was specifically designed to be user friendly for a non-technical user?

                There were a bunch of distros advertising ease of use; several were even sold in physical boxes (which was the style at the time) and marketed to consumers at retail stores like BestBuy years before Ubuntu started.

                Here are four pictures of the physical packaging for three of those pre-ubuntu desktop distros designed to be user friendly and marketed to the general public:

                Photo of the cardboard packaging for Caldera OpenLinux Another Caldera box Packaging of SuSE 8.1 Mandrake 7.2 packaging

                Ubuntu was better than what came before it in many ways, and it deserves credit for advancing desktop Linux adoption both then and now, but it was not “one of the first” by any stretch.

      • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, no.

        It was one of the first that didn’t make you to want to tear your hair out, I’ll give them that.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          That’s what I interpreted from the “targeted at regular desktop users” part.

          Certainly not one of the first distros. But one of the first that almost any normal person would actually be able to install and use? Absolutely.

          There were multiple before it that claimed to be easy for anybody to use, but most of them still weren’t by a long stretch.