• WallEx@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Institutionalized religion is bad, religion for yourself isn’t imho. I can understand the need for answers, although I don’t necessarily need them. I think that is part of tolerance, to accept the believes of others.

    • 7heo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      “Religion for yourself” in the age of internet of called “personal belief”. So, the term “religion” now only means, like it or not, “institutionalized religion”.

      This is 100% caused by the fact that people “identify” as Y (not using X as a variable, as it is now a fucking confusing buzzword), and are subsequently grouped together in “echo rooms” by various platforms algorithms. This happened so overwhelmingly that in less than a decade, it redefined the default behavior of people, online, and you will now see people automatically seeking those echo rooms. Even on Lemmy, where people are literally seeking instances that will validate their own beliefs, and block those they do not share.

      • WallEx@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Thats … Just your believes man

        If you keep away from social media as much as possible (as anyone should) its not so bad. I know a few people, that don’t go to church but believe in god.

        No one feels great by being critiqued, but its necessary imho.

    • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I can understand the need for answers, although I don’t necessarily need them.

      Btw do you think atheists always need answers for everything? I think atheists can be okay without knowing the answer. The religious people are the ones who always wants an answer(wrong answer counts) and they always explain thinks they can’t explain as “god’s creation/mystery/whatever”

      • WallEx@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        No I certainly don’t have have all the answers, the people that think they do are a huge problem.

        I can understand the need for an explanation, but I simply don’t have that need, although I like to know how things work. But if we as humantiy don’t know I don’t think its so bad.

        Yeah, if you try to change the facts because of your believe we have a problem. If your religion can adapt to new facts (or live besides them) I don’t really care.

        • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          People created god as an explaination of how the world is created and maintained. People who do science really knows that we can’t know everything for sure, and are familiar and okay with not knowing that thing.

          I said we cant know everything but we must be okay with that. Religion just takes something they see and put the “god made this” label and refuses to question god.

          If religious people don’t have that need for explaination, would they belive god created everything? Aren’t they okay with saying “we don’t really know how everything was created”?

          I can understand the need for an explanation

          Religion usually explains with something wrong and the followers simply take it as real truth. Don’t say atheists are the ones who need explaination for everything

          • WallEx@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            There is no one religion and they sure don’t handle conflicts with science the same way, so which one are you talking about?

            For example, Buddhism in its core is accepting of change in the world and aims to adapt.

            • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              which one are you talking about?

              Which is “your” religion? I’m pretty sure it isnt Buddhism. I am talking about whatever religion that puts “god” as almighty and the one who made everything including us.

              • WallEx@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I dont have one, but its an important part of peoples lives, so i think about this stuff.

                The point being, that i have less issues with that way of resolving conflicts between your believes and scientific facts.

                • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Thoose “god belivers” are like against spirit of science. Not scientific facts but scientific spirit of accepting that we have much more things to know and cannot put a god as someone who made everything the way it is, without questioning.

                  • WallEx@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Some might be, but certainly not everyone. Religious people are also individuals

    • Ignotum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      An adult that still believes in Santa might not lead to anything bad, but it leads to them indoctrinating their children to also believe in Santa into adulthood,

      And if some dude can live on the north pole and travel to every home on earth in one night, then other equally ludicrous ideas might not sound so far fetched

      And before you know it you’re wearing radioactive stickers to rebalance your chakras, sticking jade eggs up your ass to bring luck and you’re blowing up a shopping mall because your imaginary friend hates gay people

        • Ignotum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          That sounds an awful lot like sexual depravity, which makes god sad for some reason so i believe you’ll be cast into a fiery pit to have your skin melted off, regrown, then melted off again, for all eternity. And this will be just, a punishment that fits the crime

          And while you’re in excruciating pain for all eternity just remember: god loves you ♥️

      • The_Vampire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        This is a classic slippery slope fallacy. Millions of religious people exist from all sorts of ideological spectrums. The vast, vast majority are not evil and don’t do bad things.

        The extremism present in religious people is also apparent and present in atheists, agnostics, or whatever generic belief system you can think of. Religion by itself doesn’t cause extremism: ad hominems, whataboutisms, and disinformation causes extremism. Constantly comparing yourself to an enemy and convincing yourself you are in the absolute right causes extremism. Sure, you see some ‘religious’ people going crazy and shooting up places. They also have manifestos that are completely detached from reality in a way that reeks of far-right propaganda and disinformation, and never any real coherence or thought given to the religious teachings they supposedly follow (if they mention their religious texts at all, it’s often cherry-picking or outright incorrect).

        We should not try to fix the issues of mental health that plague a lot of countries by going after religion. If anything, that would only backfire by virtue of validating any persecution complex religious people might have. We should instead focus on providing affordable mental healthcare that is easily, immediately accessible and normalized for the wider population, as well as providing clear sources of valid information and having any questionable sources that construe facts and claim to not be news sources in lawsuits or elsewhere be forced to clearly denote themselves as not news regularly.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      You don’t need religion to believe in something, did this occur to you? I don’t have anything against people who believe some even weird shit. Let me hear it, let us discuss it, but do as you please (who am i to judge? I don’t know the truth).

      But the moment you enter some cult (or religion if you prefer that term), you’re on my hate-list. They are to control the weak sheeple. Period.

      Why do people always take it, that belief equals religion?

      • WallEx@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It did, because believe systems are religions I didn’t differentiate, because its besides the point.