It’s important to note that the court has not actually (yet) found that Israel is committing genocide. It’s just said to Israel “hey, while this case is ongoing, make sure no genocides happen, k?” It’s more similar to a temporary injunction that a court might make against a company during a civil suit, because the court finds it plausible that they might end up needing to make a ruling against them.
Who gives a shit? This is about media criticism of the articles published during this time which all use overt misdirection to cover up the events taking place in court
It’s important to note that the court has not actually (yet) found that Israel is committing genocide. It’s just said to Israel “hey, while this case is ongoing, make sure no genocides happen, k?” It’s more similar to a temporary injunction that a court might make against a company during a civil suit, because the court finds it plausible that they might end up needing to make a ruling against them.
And the court found it plausible that genocide is happening, which is what is needed for the process to continue.
Who gives a shit? This is about media criticism of the articles published during this time which all use overt misdirection to cover up the events taking place in court
Most of the articles I’ve seen have been making the same mistake I was trying to correct.
I forget to double back and explain this shit imma have to reply to a lot of ppl now haha