Apparently, stealing other people’s work to create product for money is now “fair use” as according to OpenAI because they are “innovating” (stealing). Yeah. Move fast and break things, huh?

“Because copyright today covers virtually every sort of human expression—including blogposts, photographs, forum posts, scraps of software code, and government documents—it would be impossible to train today’s leading AI models without using copyrighted materials,” wrote OpenAI in the House of Lords submission.

OpenAI claimed that the authors in that lawsuit “misconceive[d] the scope of copyright, failing to take into account the limitations and exceptions (including fair use) that properly leave room for innovations like the large language models now at the forefront of artificial intelligence.”

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t care if any of my FOSS software is gobbled up by a commercial AI. Someone reading my code isn’t a problem to me. If it were, I wouldn’t publish it openly.

    • sub_o@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do, especially when someone’s profiting from it, while my license is strictly for non commercial.

      • The Doctor@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same. I didn’t write it for them. I wrote it for folks who don’t necessarily have a lot of money but want something useful.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, for $20/mo I get a super-educated virtual assistant/tutor. It’s pretty awesome.

          I’d say that’s some good value for people without much money. All of my open source libs are published under the MIT license if I recall correctly. I’ve made so much money using open source software, I don’t mind giving back, even to people who are going to make money with my code.

          It makes me feel good to think my code could be involved in money changing hands. It’s evidence to me that I built something valuable.

          • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            $20/mo

            good value for people without much money

            The absolute majority of people can not afford that. This is especially true for huge part of the art that was used to train various models on.

            AI currently is a tool for rich people by rich people which uses the work of poor people who themselves won’t be able to benefit from it.

            • intensely_human@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              And yet it is orders of magnitude less than it cost a year ago to hire someone to do research, write reports, and tutor me in any subject I want.

              If an artist can’t afford $20/mo they need a job to support that hobby.