• TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    What are they trying to fuck up down on their quest for the “perfect vision”?

        • Spectacle8011@lemmy.comfysnug.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          So if GNOME does something everyone else is not doing, they’re “fucking up”, but if they follow what someone else has done that you like, they’re just creating a “cheap copy”? How do they win?

        • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          And Boxes looked like a cheap copy of Virtualbox. But now it’s my daily driver because how good it is

          • TCB13@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Boxes is so… damn… unbearably… slow. Subpar virtualization.

        • MissionCenter is a cheap copy of Windows Task Manager (except it’s missing a few tabs, menu items, columns, etc.), so I guess this must be a free copy, then?

          The proposed mockup seems to be a combination of the best features of MissionCenter and Resources. With MissionCenter still lacking many festures present in even Gnome’s minimalistic alternative, I think extending these existing products to actually make a useful Task Manager alternative is a benefit to everyone.