• SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You might get up votes if you accompanied a controversial opinion with a reasoned argument. However, making only broad, unsubstantiated statements is a waste of bandwidth and everyone’s time.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You might get up votes if you accompanied a controversial opinion with a reasoned argument.

        Ultimately I agree that they should include the argument, but adding a reasoned argument has very little affect on the use of the vote buttons as “agree/disagree.”

    • Jack.@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      China is also the world leader in sustainable public transportation solutions

    • Skua@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They’re a “better than ICE cars” thing. I’ll take whatever improvements I can get

    • thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I assume you mean that they’re not a positive for our environment, even so they’re much better for our local environment, which is still one better than petrol and diesel cars imo.

    • Auzy@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why not? This has been researched many times, and the results are consistently that it is a good thing already, and getting better, in regards to overall co2 produced

      They’re also far more efficient than fuel cell too