• Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Did you read the article? No, you did not.

    According to the company this is all from regular 3rd party stuff. Being legal or not is beside the point when you are not actually doing something.

    You’re argument is based on what a marketing company put in their marketing.

    Read the article, with clarifications from the company

    ETA : if this were true I would either see it in my firewall logs, or it would blow through my data cap in a week. Surveillance capitalism is bullshit, this is just a grift.

    • library_napper@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seems funny how you keep saying from the company as if somehow asking s murderer with red bloody hands if they did it is somehow a creditable source

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re argument is based on what a marketing company put in their marketing.

      But your response is

      with clarifications from the company

      So what the company says isn’t good enough… Except when it’s in your favor? You realize that both statement are “from the company”.

      • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fight as long as you want, when they were called out on it they backed off. The technical aspects of this are not trivial, nor is the amount of data needed as anyone who has had an Alexa or similar spyware in their house will tell you.

        Like I said

        if this were true I would either see it in my firewall logs, or it would blow through my data cap in a week.