If lemmy had user-defined filters, I’d use them. Right now I’m downvoting the stuff, but there’s already a community for musk-related stuff: [email protected]

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes!

    Please yes.

    I’m tired of seeing the same story of that chode in six or seven different communities.

    • hyorvenn@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Wait you mean you don’t want to hear the next pricing plan for twitter? Aren’t you a tech enthusiast???

  • witx@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    No, that would be beneficial for him and like-minded people. It creates a bubble around him where only his supporters know what’s going on.

  • ZooGuru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Some Lemmy apps have filters. I use Memmy for Lemmy and it has filters. That assumes you use your phone and not a browser.

  • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Holy cow, this sounds like a moderation nightmare–glad I don’t have to do it! There’s no way you’re going to get through it without someone complaining about it.

    In my mind, this is definitely something that individuals should address with blocks and filters. If those filters don’t exist, they should be written.

  • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Musk has already been banned as a topic on tech communities in 4 instances I’ve seen personally. I get folks are tired of him and I find him insufferable, but he is often relevant (unfortunately) to current events, so I don’t think wholesale bans of him are a good idea. There are plenty of topics I find annoying, but I don’t tell people to ban the topic from the community just for my personal preference.

    Like I think trump is a cringe inducing piece of shit and don’t enjoy seeing him everywhere. I’d love a filter, I don’t expect communities to ban him as a topic.

    • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah but relevant to current tech events? Not that often.

      It’s complicated I guess.

      Musk offering starlink access to gaza is tech news, him changing subscription prices for xitter is not.

      I guess I just mean that a happening is not “tech” by virtue of musk saying it.

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        He owns starlink, Twitter, Tesla, and SpaceX. Whether we like it or not all of these have huge bearings on their respective industries.

        And before people started hating musk, again rightfully so I’m embarrassed I ever liked him, you couldn’t go a day without something about SpaceX and people getting all excited. This is purely about the person, not the relevance of the topics.

        If y’all could somehow come up with a nuanced soft ban on “his personal life“ and politics or whatever, I guess that’s a decent compromise? But that just sounds tedious and people will bicker. And also his politics unfortunately have an impact on how Twitter is run, so you would have to find ways to separate those things out. It’s just seems kind of needless.

        I mean imagine if we couldn’t spread the word/learn of what he was doing with his starlink satellites and Ukraine/Russia. That stuff is really important.

        • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The nuanced soft ban you’re talking about is just the topic of the community.

          When musk does something tech related that’s tech. When he does something that’s not tech related that’s off topic.

          Twitter is a social media website it’s not tech.

  • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Moderator here.

    Since there is a loud and collective voice, I will do it, but not all news related to Twitter or Musk can be banned. This is something that you folks need to give me input on. There is going to be a level or kind of essential news that impacts us all, that needs to be allowed to post, and for that we need some agreeable middle ground.

    Inputs?

    • echutaa@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      For me it’s the difference between a statements and events. If Musk just says something it’s generally worthless drivel, but if Tesla engineers a new battery pack or gets targeted by a lawsuit then it’s something worth knowing.

      • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I had a similar approach in mind, so it seems it will work. I myself despise the Elon Musk yapping and paparazzi gospel tabloid pieces.

    • onlinepersona@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think anything “musk did/said ABC” should be banned. Reading news about SpaceX or whatever else Musk owns that’s technology related is fine IMO, but the constant “Musk this” and “Musk that” just makes me downvote or at “worst” unsub.

      Regarding Twitter, if lemmy had filters, I’d block all of that too. However I can see that it has some influence on people and would be fine treating it as an exception to the muskysphere as long as it doesn’t contain “Musk” in the title.

      My 2 cents. Thank you for considering the ban 🙏

      • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        As long as people report, and if I notice that kind of Elon Musk paparazzi gospel crap, it will be removed as long as I stay mod. Active during Indian timezone. I do try complain about Lemmy’s mod tools occasionally, because that and some form of CSAM filtering are key concerns now that platform is steadily growing.

        incoming rant

        Usually an active and reasonable mod tries finding the “moderate” balance on posting and discourse, but they are rare nowadays. I am not spez or a typical reddit mod “mod”. I was born out of the community if that makes any sense, so I am handling the privacy and tech sublemmys for a good while, cushioning the impact of Lemmy adopters.

  • Auzy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes Please. Twitter is dead, and we’re just reminding people to go take a look at it constantly. Just let the internet forget about him.

    • bankimu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Twitter is very much active, it is the first place all political discussions happen. It is where the Israel attacks unfolded. It is where every big figure has an account and share their viewpoints.

      It is also where you often see two sides having very different viewpoints argue, something in which it is unique - since by design it tries to allow different ideas even if you don’t agree with them.

      But not so with Lemmy - which is extremely left centric, and harbours so much hatred against people, censorship, and the ostrich syndrome of burying you head in the sand, that this post to censor Elon and this amazing claim that Twitter is dead gets so much attraction. Case in point how I predict when near 100% accuracy that this comment will be voted down and buried.

      • Auzy@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Lol. Both sides argue? Most tweets are by a small number of people. Before, right wingers were complaining it’s all bots, now suddenly, Elon pushes dodgy Right wing accounts to the frontpage and you guys reckon it’s not true anymore.

        How many people do you know who actually use Twitter? I can only think of one, and fairly sure he left it ages ago.

        Twitter is growing in irrelevance. Just because people have accounts on it doesn’t mean they use it either.

        Do you really think Twitter is growing? Lol.

      • jackalope@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        lol you can’t be censored on lemmy. It’s a decentralized platform. Just start your own server.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t think content should be banned on Lemmy just because some people are tired of it. But each instance can have its own rules of course.