Personally, I find his Linux and privacy-related endeavors commendable, but I widely disregard of his political stances.

  • simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    He’s very edgy, I don’t like his content. If I want someone to talk about tech, I’d rather they just talk about tech and not make wojack thumbnails and constantly making fun of politics.

    • Prunebutt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      If he only knew anything about politics, it wouldn’t be so bad. He seriously applauded Elon Musk for “fighting” against media bias by “the far-left democrats”. 🫠

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Tech content is passable, wish he’d stick to that. Been losing points with politics, cheap merch and lazying out with what basically amounts to reaction videos.

    Any other recommendations for tech content? Seytonic and The new oil are nice.

  • Ironfist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Anything with pepe the frog or anime in the thumbnails or anybody that says “based” is not worth it in my opinion.

      • sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yeah, nah, I don’t think that’s true my dude. I’ve heard his opinions on the gay agenda, 5g, trans people, and ‘cultural marxism’ being taught in our schools. I think it’s just as serious as the place he gets alot of his views, the image boards we all know. It’s the same irony you see on 4chan

          • sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            You can watch the podcast, or longer form political videos, that lukesmith does where he goes onbut he also peppers it into his videos every so often. I haven’t watched in a while, so maybe he’s calmed down a bit, but he seems to do this more frequently around major events

  • settinmoon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Informative tech content. I’m right leaning but more towards the center so I don’t agree with everything he says politically speaking, but I have no issues viewing his content since at the end of the day he’s still libertarian and anti-establishment. I also have no problems holding conversations with the anarcho socialists on lemmy, because at the end of the day they’re also not advocating for more control over my life, we just have disagreements on the technical details of how society should work.

  • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Same as Luke smith, good linux content but they both cryptofascists. Also its funny that they both turned into grifters, one with monero and one with a shitty dropshipping merch.

  • megaman@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I disagree with his right-wing libertarianism, as many have said. I found him when i was getting into tech privacy stuff and watched it, then youtube started giving me more of the harder weirdos who were a little more fashy. I dont think Mental Outlaw is a facist, dont get me wrong - but the youtube algorithm may send you that direction.

    I think his older stuff was better and just had more content in each video. More recent videos (last 6-12 months?) it seems like he’s got two news articles he reads but then he just goes on big tangents to fill space.

          • tricoro@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Libertarians can be left or right. What they have in common is that the government should have limited powers, but what they disagree with is what type of limited powers it should have. Rightist libertarians believe in laissez faire capitalism (their main name in economics is Ludwig von Mises), while leftist libertarians believe that corporations should be put at more scrutiny by the government.

            • Prunebutt@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              Small correction: Leftist libertarians is usually another term for anarchism. I.e. There shouldn’t be neither governments nor corporations, but rather decentralized, self-governed communities and worker-owned cooperatives.

              • tricoro@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                The way I learned it is that anarcho-socialism is the extremist version of leftist libertarianism. A moderate libertarian doesn’t mind the existence of a government, as long as it is limited. As for the anarchists, I know that they exist and I know that there are both on the left and the right, but I don’t have interest in reading their literature (it might be a cool theory to read, but the fact that it is so far from practice makes my interest in it practically vanish).

                • Prunebutt@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I’ve never heard any libertarians be referred to as “moderate”. As far as I understand it, “libertarianism” already includes a radical worldview. Wanting less government an simultaneously more government control IMHO sound a bit oxymoronic.

                  As an anarchist myself, of course I disagree with your stance on the practicability on anarchism. ;)