• EvilColeslaw@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The stupid part is nobody really cares how much they want to charge to organizations wanting to train AI models. Literally all they have to do is offer a reasonable price for third party app developers. It’s not that hard to have different price tiers for different use cases.

    • CookieJarObserver@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 years ago

      This argument about ai companys is completely ridiculous anyway, the training data is harvested with scrapers, not the api.

    • Ollie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      And I don’t get why they never served their adds over the API if they were that desperate. If it was about the money they would have done that already. It’s about cutting out 3rd parties.

      • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        This. If they really wanted ads they could insert them into the posts at the back end so when retrieved there would just be posts, some of which would have been ads. Anyway fuck 'em. None of these corporations give a shot about the users not their employees . Its better to invest in user controlled alternatives.

        • Corngood@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I think legislation about ads being clearly marked stops that from happening.

          • 1mpulse@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            So what? Make it a requirement that any third party app must show a responsibile amount of ads in order to continue to use the API. Anyone found violating gets their rights removed.