• Melkath@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re just being purposefully obtuse now.

    No. The kids aren’t the ones going to prison, but the prohibition laws do send people to prison.

      • Melkath@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No. I am pointing out that you are making two conflicting statements.

        You are doing mental gymnastics.

        Back to the point “Noone goes to prison for underage smoking”. Yes they do. When you make prohibition laws creating the concept of “underage smoking” you ARE sending SOMEONE to prison.

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you genuinely couldn’t piece together that he meant “smoking while underage” when he said “underage smoking” then I’m seriously concerned for you.

          • Melkath@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you genuinely don’t understand how the English language works and you want to create your own form of doublespeak where you say “Noone goes to prison” but you really mean “let’s imprison poor people and still not solve the issue” them I’m seriously concerned for you.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No one but you is being obtuse here.

      You “corrected” someone by making an entirely different point from the one they made. In fact, the person you said was “wrong” actually stated the very thing you did.

      No one is saying your point is wrong. Just that it isn’t a correction.