• lud@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are you saying this is the result of MS policies from the windows 1-3.1 era?

    • buckykat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Specifically from the introduction of Windows 95 tying Windows and MS-DOS together. While Windows was an application running on DOS Microsoft tried various schemes to break compatibility when it was run on other competing DOSes, and Windows 95 was the final stroke of that strategy by tying the GUI inextricably into the OS.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is it better for you now that windows is the whole OS and not just the “gui”?

        • buckykat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No it’s worse. Tying the OS and GUI together to the extent they are in modern post-95 Windows is a major cause of the learned helplessness OP is talking about

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe but I can’t personally blame someone for improving their product and throwing away DOS entirely.

            They ditched DOS with XP, so ≈22 years ago.