Police investigating after former tree of the year winner, estimated to be several hundred years old, felled
Edit: Update!
Police arrest 16-year-old after Northumberland landmark ‘felled’
If found guilty, let him pay for replanting a similar-aged tree to the site.
Throw the book at him!
With paper manufactured from the tree!
Why not skip the “making paper” step?
That little shit.
Lil shits.
We have reason to believe it has been deliberately felled.
I wonder what gave it away.
Someone needs to mill it and make a lot of souvenirs to help pay for the new tree.
just a put wood glue
deleted by creator
but glue is for tree is wood glue
Can someone explain why it’s so terrible, that this tree has been felled?
I don’t think I’ve seen it before, so to me it’s more significant that it fell on Hadrian’s wall. But I do seem to be ignorant here, so can someone educate me?It was hundreds of years old and people liked the tree enough that it was featured in photographs and film. It’s not terribly complicated.
To many in the region, it was more than just a tree. It was where they proposed, it was where they went to find calm during a tough period, it was where they said their final goodbyes to a loved one etc. To say the tree was iconic would be an understatement. It was a constant in a time of change and a place of undeniable beauty in a world of increasing shit. The kinda place you make a special trip out to once your kids are old enough and show them a part of their local identity, untouched by the passing of time.
At the end of the day, yes it is just a tree. But it is also a many missed memories being made and just one more destruction of something just a little special. It’s no surprise people were speculating that some landowner or farmer was refused planning permission after it first happened. Because that is what we’re used to, someone selfish taking away something that was just there because it was beautiful.
Read the article, it contain info.
Trees are only significant if you’ve seen them?
He’s literally asking for knowledge. And your take is to ask him if something is only significant if he’s seen it?
It’s historic?
It’s like burning down a historic building for the fuck of it. My curiosity is why you’re taking an apologist stance on willful destruction.
At a minimum, it was owned by the national trust, so in no way was it his tree to cut down.
Not sure why you are being down voted. You are asking for knowledge. Others have provided decent answers though. Again not sure why you are being down voted.
Well, I assume some people understood me as asking “It’s just a tree, why the bother?”. I tried to get around this with wording, but whatever.
I kinda guess this is largely a “local” thing (not sure how large “local” is though). And of course it’s a pity that an angry teen destroyed a hundreds of years old tree.
