• mutter9355@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The ussr may not have been communist, but it was definitely the initial goal. The idea of a revolution that leads to a dictatorship of the proletariat is inherently flawed. You just end up replacing a corrupt government with another corrupt government.

    • Album@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The idea of a revolution that leads to a dictatorship of the proletariat is inherently flawed.

      Not all Communists are Marxist-Lenninists or Stalinist… But obviously Lenin and Stalin were. Non-ML Communists would agree with you.

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Revolutions in general are only really good for replacing dictatorships and monarchies, it’s kind of like re-rolling your government with a high chance of getting the worst kind, so you only use it when your government is already the worst kind. Usually, Power Vacuum’s just get filled by whoever has the most military might.