• TheYang@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Valid concern, although I wonder if it’s more or less likely to be the reason for delay than the other required parts.
    I wouldn’t expect for Artemis 3 to male 2025, but I couldn’t guess at the reason.

    • zhunk@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The other main risk for Artemis 3 timing is the suits, right? I don’t see SLS+Orion being fast by any means, but they at least don’t need any development work between now and then.

      • antangil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Artemis 3 is good but Artemis IV needs block 1b and probably BOLE. Both have elements of new development.

        • zhunk@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Artemis 4 being NET 2028 (mostly because of EUS dev time?) might take some serious wind out of the sails of this whole program, regardless of how Artemis 3 plays out.