It’s so weird.

Due to the fact that Facebook has chosen to involve software that will allow the theft of my personal information, I do declare the following: on this day, 30th November 2014, in response to the new Facebook guidelines and under articles L.111, 112 and 113 of the code of intellectual property, I declare that my rights are attached to all my personal data, drawings, paintings, photos, texts etc… published on my profile since the day I opened my account. For commercial use of the foregoing my written consent is required at all times. Those reading this text can copy it and paste it on their Facebook wall. This will allow them to place themselves under the protection of copyright. By this release, I tell Facebook that it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, broadcast, or to take any other action against me on the basis of this profile and/or its contents. The actions mentioned above apply equally to employees, students, agents and/or other staff under the direction of Facebook. The contents of my profile include private information. The violation of my privacy is punished by the law (UCC 1 1-308 - 308 1 -103 and the Rome Statute). Facebook is now an open capital entity. All members are invited to post a notice of this kind, or if you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you have not published this statement at least once, you will tacitly allow the use of elements such as your photos as well as the information contained in your profile update. Do not share. Just copy on paste on your wall.

Pretty much, yeah.

UTM may be somewhat shinier, but you can run anything you like in qemu on a mac.

Jesus, what clickbait. It’s a bug in fluent bit.

I’m impressed the verge was able to refer to the issue without using the word nudes in the headline.

Why was the reddit post source deleted?

Honestly, the mastodon obsession seems like a you problem. Talk about what you want on the fediverse. Maybe mastodon users see it, maybe they don’t, who cares.

Who goes out of their way to install requests-darwin-lite?

As opposed to successful social media posts, which would never go viral by telling everyone how much everything sucks.

I have some older laptops that are 1080p, which was great at the time, but they are now obviously inferior at displaying text, etc. 4k can be overkill, 1440p (or 1600, or thereabouts) is usually fine (for me).

Some necessary caveats: This kind of attack can only be pulled off in relatively narrow circumstances by a dedicated attacker. Segal said the user would need to have installed a malicious browser extension or be in transit and use public Wi-Fi where their traffic could be intercepted and decrypted through a MITM attack.

Well, okay. Maybe there’s something new here, but despite the many paragraphs of exposition, this sounds like exactly the sort of cookie stealing attack that’s been possible for decades.

Is the big breakthrough here that somebody realized FIDO doesn’t change that? Like, uh, no kidding? What’s new?

Real talk, the mastodon traffic stampede isn’t that bad for a properly configured website.

Every phone can have two batteries if you just get a battery pack.

Why in the world would I want to see more bullshit from weirdos and grifters I don’t follow?

https://github.com/px-loops/loopd

I could do this in a weekend!

Link to the source?

If there were somehow a strict definition of the Article spec, mastodon would simply ignore it.

It’s just basically just a link. (For mastodon. I think hometown inlines it somewhat properly.)

Yeah, so if they have the code, they could run it…

Screenshot?