No ads, no “privacy” popups, no “pleeeeeease log in” popups… I dunno… Makes the platform usable for me…

The interview probably ends abruptly when he finds out, she’s homosexual.

Bloodborne

Well, unfortunately, we also have idiots here in Germany… There is probably a fan club. Mainly the right voters…

But no, I don’t think, that this changes who builds the next government in Germany.

It’s hard to ban political parties here.

Some people will try this, but our law could stop that…

low education + lots of propaganda

Right, let’s ignore Hungary… We in the EU do that, too.

Nah, this is not allowed in working democracies.

AGI is currently just a buzzword anyway…

Microsoft defines AGI in contracts in dollars of earnings…

If you’d travel in time 5 years back and show the currently best GPT to someone, he/she would probably accept it as AGI.

I’ve seen multiple experts in German television explaining that LLMs will reach the AGI state within a few years…

(That does not mean that the CEO guy isn’t a fool. Let’s wait for the first larger problem that requires not writing new code, but rather dealing with a bug, something not documented, or similar…)

Why would Ukraine send them back there? If NK wants them back, it’d probably be expensive…

That’s not a bad argument.

Keeps the question open whether this is also part of https://www.statista.com/statistics/494425/death-rate-worldwide-by-energy-source/

Come one… If it’s really about minimizing death, just build photovoltaik on the ground. But that’s not the priority of humanity anyways.

You kind of missed the point of my post. I don’t want to get rid of nuclear. I just don’t want to build new NPPs, when there is a far cheaper alternative.

BTW: How many people have died because of photovoltaic that is constructed on the ground on large fields? Probably 0… If you want to minimize death, this is the way to go.

If the premisse is to avoid possibly every death, photovoltaic on the ground, e.g. on fields (not on houses) would probably be the least deadly solution.

Prices of renewables are dropping for years. If building them becomes difficult because of missing materials, the prices would rise, which is not happening at the moment. Why not just building renewables as long as it’s the far cheaper solution?

And how does this justify paying a lot more tax payer money to build the NPP instead of renewables?

France does not only focus on renewables BTW. They have NPPs that already handle the baseline. And building more of them is just not useful at all, when there is a better alternative…

That’s what I wrote in my 2nd sentence. That does not justify building more of them, because the baseline is already handled by the existing power plants.

I hope, nuclear means nuclear fusion here…

Renewables are far cheaper and can be built faster and if they malfunction, no one is in danger.

France already has enough Nuclear to deal with no-sun and no-wind phases (if they work properly, which is the other problem with nuclear energy in France)…

So, there is literally no reason to waste tax payer money and time like this and to force yourself to import material from Russia. Just build renewables until we get fusion energy…

Then, the priority should still be renewables, because they are far cheaper, can be build faster and if they malfunction, no one is in danger. France has enough Nuclear to deal with no-sun and no-wind phases (if they work fine, which is the other problem with nuclear energy in France)…