• CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      No. I invoked it to highlight the absurdity of this line of thinking: that it is somehow acceptable to damage the property of a worker who may be completely innocent.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        It’s absurd because there is no slippery slope. People are not going to start torching Ferraris or burn windows 95 CDs.

        It’s offensive because you are using it to defend an actual Nazi.

        Is it somehow acceptable for Elon to damage the lives of millions of worker who may be completely innocent?