A joint U.S.-Mexico topographical survey found that 787 feet of the 995-feet-long buoy line set up by Texas are in Mexico.

  • venusenvy47@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    190
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sounds like Mexico can just take down most of this thing.

    Edit: As a US citizen, I support Mexico’s immigration services to detain any Texas construction workers that illegally cross the border to service this thing.

    I also would support the governor of this region of Mexico to put these construction workers on a bus and drop them deep in the heart of Mexico somewhere.

    • comedy@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      93
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They should. Send Abbott a bill for polluting their waterway too, while they’re at it.

      • venusenvy47@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Probably the only reason Mexico hasn’t already pulled it out is because they don’t want to waste money that they know will never be reimbursed to them.

        Maybe the US will take it down and bill Texas themselves.

    • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why arrest Texans who enter Mexico to kill people? Just shoot the Texans before they can cause any damage

    • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      As funny as it would be, taking it out on construction workers who probably didn’t choose to be there seems a little unfair

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They should just be drowned. That’s the purpose for this barrier, so I think it’d be fair to drown anyone working to construct it. (I don’t condone drowning the workers, but the workers should stand up against their employers due to drowning risk. If they don’t listen, maybe they should have an “accident” and “drown” instead and the workers take control.)

  • wheresmypillow@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every state’s geography has different challenges. Texas is blessed with natural resources and rich farmland. It is a rich state. Spending that money on murder buoys instead of immigration services is a crime against humanity.

  • superkret@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait what? Texas put up a border barrier without permission from the Federal government?

    • livus@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      122
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes and it’s causing deaths (it has nets under it), so the US govt is not best pleased.

        • Neato@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          99
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Too bad for Texas that the constitution outlines that only the federal government has the right to deal with other countries. Both the Treaty Clause and Logan Act cover this base. Texas is wrong.

        • Unaware7013@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          62
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Texas has much bigger problems they should be dealing with. Having a reliable grid should be a much bigger priority than the border, but Texas would rather kill people (at the border, or just in their own homes during a snowstorm) than fix their actual problems.

          But hey, that’s the republican MO.

              • pwnstar@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                29
                ·
                1 year ago

                There’s an easy way to avoid the murder buoy saws called “stop crossing the border illegally”.

              • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                33
                ·
                1 year ago

                If only you could use your eyes. There were never any saws only scallop edged plates designed to keep people from being able to grab between the buoys and slide through. The nets can also be understood to be barriers In place to stop people from diving under the bouys. Without seeing a picture of the nets, I cannot make any claims to their danger because they could be a fine mesh or they could be a rope net. One would be stubstantially more dangerous than the other.

        • Chaser@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          50
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The vast majority of illegal immigrants overstay their visas. You’re looking at the southern border, you should be looking at airports

        • norbert@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You seriously think Texas has to deal with more immigration than the entirety of the rest of the U.S.?

          Critical thinking really needs to be taught in school.

          • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            45
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think that TEXAS has to deal with illegal immigration across the TEXAS boarder into TEXAS. I said nothing about anywhere else and the amount of immigrants they have to deal with.

            • norbert@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              34
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The Border Patrol and Customs (in the Department of Homeland Security) is actually responsible for securing borders. States do not get to decide how their borders are enforced.

              We all have to deal with illegal immigration, most of which doesn’t even happen on the southern border. We manage to do it without building death traps or tricking people into getting on busses and sending them to states we don’t like.

              I know Texas and Abbot think they’re special but they’re wrong.

          • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            120
            ·
            1 year ago

            And some of them would gladly take your life if it meant they got it to be part of the cool kids club. (Gang initiations)

            • Unaware7013@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              47
              ·
              1 year ago

              And some of them would gladly take your life if it meant they got it to be part of the cool kids club. (Gang initiations)

              I honestly don’t know if you’re referring to illegal immigrants or the police in America.

              I’m more worried about the police killing me than an illegal immigrant, but that’s because I live in the real world.

            • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              47
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              We have plenty of those domestically already. People are people, and y’all qaeda down there isn’t exactly the shining example of civilization you think it is.

            • Polar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Big words coming from a guy who lives in a country where your own citizens are gunning down others every day multiple times per day.

              Maybe try to fix your own country first instead of blaming others?

              • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                21
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah, gang crime. The vast vast majority of gun deaths in America, aside from suicides are known criminals who shouldn’t own guns in the first place.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              Immigrants are, on average, less violent and more productive than the average American. I say we toss you out and trade up.

        • SuiXi3D@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          57
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ah yes, a person’s value as a human being is reduced to nothing the second they cross an imaginary line decided by folks that have long since died. Makes perfect sense. /s

          • IceMan@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I share your sentiment however despite the “looks” the actual line does not matter much. It’s about what you have to do to gain rights. Is traveling across some line and being desperate enough to grant this person rights? (Like right to work/live in some community/country)? Or are some additional hoops needed? If they’re needed why should anybody allow other people rights just for traveling across the line? Isn’t it unfair to these who spent years of work trying to go through proper procedure? Maybe it’s okay if somebody is desperate? But then what is the measure of “desperate” - it’s a pretty unclear term.

            • noqturn@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              “Hey man I’m not too stoked on ice cream”

              “What do you have against brownies???”

              That’s what you sound like.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          54
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Trying to move somewhere for a better life for your family, your sentence is death.

          Get a fucking grip.

            • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              45
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, but that doesn’t change the fact that you thinking someone deserves death for an illegal border crossing shows how fucked your mindset is

            • DancingYetiCrab@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              22
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The vast majority of illegal immigration is done by people overstaying visas. Take you’re racist uninformed and sickening list for injury and death and shove it up your ass

              • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                16
                ·
                1 year ago

                And that makes illegal border crossers not exist? Just because there’s another problem doesn’t mean there can’t be two problems at once.

        • EpicFailGuy@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          @Tb0n3

          @livus @superkret @themeatbridge

          That’s a very simplistic and apathetic response to a human being dying …

          I bet you support the death penalty for people that steal a loaf of bread to feed their children as well.

          The reality is that it’s a very complex issue and while Texas has the right to secure it’s borders a humans right to live is a little more important me thinks.

          • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            48
            ·
            1 year ago

            At the size of a state government deaths are statistics. And funny you should mention stealing. In another thread I was arguing that stealing is immoral and should face punishment, even food. Just like going hungry has programs to help, so does immigration have processes to go through to do it legally.

            Don’t steal and don’t cross sovereign borders without permission. There are consequences to actions. Don’t start crying because someone suffered the consequences.

            • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Ah yes, why don’t they just use those vague programs you alluded to?

              I’m sure you can tell all of us what those programs are and how easy they are to be eligible/apply through. Right? I mean certainly you know what these programs are and wouldn’t just be assuming they’re in place and functional. After all, a blatant assumption like that would make you an utter jackass if it turned out those programs weren’t actually available for everyone or were needlessly restrictive/difficult.

              • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                SNAP, WIC, unemployment, food banks, meals on wheels, shelters, churches, etc. There’s a plethora of resources for the poor to get food.

            • letsalllovelain@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Suffered the consequences of what, exactly? The consequences of being born into a world that doesn’t provide for them? The consequences of unequal access to opportunity?

              Guess then we should get to shoving some consequences your way for being a dick. Your speech is harmful, and you don’t deserve clean food or water or a warm place to sleep.

              Get our of here with your garbage. Your life is not more valuable than ANYONE elses.

        • SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Imagine swimming in a river in your own country and then you get caught up in a net and die while still in your country due to Texas illegally setting up their own border wall that isn’t even in Texas anymore. Texas should should hire this guy to go to the river and whenever kids drown trying to just enjoy themselves he is there but always wait 5 minutes to make sure the Mexicans drowned since he obviously hates them and then unties them, bring them up to shore, and then yell this in their face. I think he would gladly take the job all the while moving back and fourth illegally from the Mexico and Texas border just to yell at dead Mexicans

          I can’t imagine what situation you grew up in to have so much hate in your heart. What you and a shit to of racists don’t understand is that if we had all the immigrants in America disappear, the labor force, and crops for example would shit the bed so fast. The immigrants all do the jobs you fuckers won’t do and you don’t actually care enough to learn on how much of the country they hold on their back. It’s always simple though, instead of actual being about “America” and filling the gaps you would just complain someone else needs to do these high labor intensive jobs

          • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            34
            ·
            1 year ago

            Go ahead and tell me how many were just swimming in the Rio Grande when they just so happened to get caught in the border defense when they weren’t actually trying to cross the border. I can guarantee it’s zero.

            • SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              First off you’re so dumb dude. How about instead of intentionally killing others in an absolutely beautiful river we just enjoy it? Ever thought that idk, maybe, some of them genuinely just wanted a swim?

              The more important part is that since you are so ‘MERICA🦅⛪🙏’ then why are you okay with these deaths while they are completely illegal and dong follow the constitution? Referenced From this comment

              https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/a43a23ea-5314-4b82-9493-d02761e77e99.jpeg

              I mean i figure since youre okay with that ill just go ahead and completely ignore laws to do whatever the hell i want to do. When did the constitution just become another ‘woke’ book to you that should be ignored?

              • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                14
                ·
                1 year ago

                When did I say anyone was intentionally killed. If anything it could be viewed as suicide. They’re bright fucking orange aren’t they?

                • SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You keep ignoring over half of my comments. Do you really think Texas of all places would put a buoy with a net but not create the net in such a way that it would tangle someone up? Are there any warnings about there being nets? How would you feel if Mexico set something that long up in the river but 80% of it was across the border?

        • Polar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well how else are Americans supposed to leave their shit hole country for Mexico?

        • Throwaway@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree that they’re criminals, shouldn’t be encouraged, and need to be deported, but death is a little much.

          • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            28
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Honestly it came out a bit harsh but the point was that they’re doing very risky things knowing there are risks to their lives but they do it anyway. If a guy is dancing on a cliff and falls off you don’t blame the cliff.

    • Throwaway@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes? Hell, border towns put up barriers without state or federal permission.

      Thats not the problem.

  • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    LOL CBS! There is no such thing as “technically” in Mexico. The barrier is in Mexico and Mexican authorities should just cut it up and remove it.

  • poprocks@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They should sell it back to Texas at a huge markup. Then when it floats back over to their waters, sell it back again, and again, and again. Endless money stream.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let’s give it back to Mexico, the Republicans were screaming that we should let Russia have Ukraine because it used to be part of Russia, and as it turns out Texas used to be part of Mexico. Problem solved.

      • possibly a cat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think temporary safe corridors and refugee support should enacted for the failed states in the US. Hanging onto them for the sake of a minority of people is clearly harmful to the greater society, but arguably residents in other states do have a moral obligation (which likely won’t be upheld) to the peers that they also failed as a union.

        I understand not having a choice about moving, completely. But keep in mind how the opinions on Texas of other states evolves as things get worse and worse, and the scale of the effort needed to move populations even if they are a minority. If you can make a plan for getting out while there is still an opportunity to get out, it may serve you well in the future.

        And it’s definitely not just a Texas thing. Arizona and Florida appear to be on the same trajectory, at the very least. Most likely Louisiana, too. The functioning states won’t be able to rebuild the failed ones infinitely; it’s already a huge drain and the costs grow each year. You don’t want to get stuck in the pack once hope is given up and everyone is trying to evacuate. It will likely only become more and more expensive over time.

        • SuiXi3D@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I had to move to low-income housing because no job I’m able to get pays enough for a ‘real’ apartment. I can move to my hometown, but It’s the same thing there. I barely make enough to get by. Were it not for my wife also working, we’d both be homeless.

          Trust me. I’d love to move somewhere else, where a post-high school education wouldn’t make me more broke than I am, where good jobs grow on trees, and where housing is reasonably priced. But I can’t. So I Vite blue and get shit on for it here. But I do it anyway, because the asshole fascists that run this state sure as hell haven’t made my life any easier.

          • possibly a cat@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, I get it. That’s why I suggested trying to work out a longer-term plan, but I understand that some people are just stuck. Plain and simple. The system is designed for it to be that way. I really hope safe corridors materialize when things start break down. It’s the rational and humane response in my opinion.

            There won’t be good jobs on trees, reasonable housing, etc., in other states but at least the working class wouldn’t be stuck as tools for the local fascists like they are now. It’s no coincidence the right of mobility has been scrapped.

  • GlendatheGayWitch@lib.lgbt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought that the treaty from the Spanish-American War made the Rio Grande neutral territory. Any land that appears in the middle of the river doesn’t belong to either country.

    Unless there have been other treaties that I didn’t learn about in my history classes, the buoys technically are infringement on neutral territory.

    • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      How does that figure when the river changes course? Does texas/mexico suddenly have more/less land and everyone’s chill?

      • CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Totally nothing to do with the Rio Grande-case, but I find it interesting seeing how borders are drawn when time goes on. Look at the original 13 states in the US. Lines are squiggly, and made with care after the terrain. Then, some time has passed, and the US started to grow eastwards. Then the borders were made quickly with rulers.

        You see the same in Australia. NSW and Victoria is a bit squiggly for a while, but then the colonisers said “hand me the fucking ruler, cunt!”

      • Longpork_afficianado@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pretty much, yeah. A lot of property boundaries are defined in refererence to adjacent bodies of water. It makes sense too, otherwise you’ll get weird edge cases where 3m^2 of land on the mexican side belongs to USA because the river drifted since 1850. What are you gonna do with that little plot? Swim over there and put a fence around it?

      • GlendatheGayWitch@lib.lgbt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, pretty much.

        One time there was also an island that appeared in the Rio Grande that some people claimed as another country with a flag and everything. The US military kicked them off of it.

  • rgb3x3@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    US: “Everything on this side of the line is ours, those are the rules.”

    Mexico: “But you can’t keep moving the line into my side, that’s not fair!”

    US “Yeah huh, mom said that’s how it works.”

    Mexico: “No she didn’t! You’re lying!”

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Nearly 80% of the controversial floating barrier Texas state officials assembled in the middle of the Rio Grande to deter migrant crossings is technically on the Mexican side of the U.S.-Mexico border, according to a federal government survey released on Tuesday.

    The river barrier, assembled near the Texas border town of Eagle Pass, has come under national and international scrutiny, including from the Mexican government, which has strongly voiced its objections to the buoys.

    But Steve McCraw, director of the Texas Department of Public Safety, said preliminary information indicated that the first person found dead had “drowned upstream from the marine barrier and floated into the buoys.”

    Abbott and other Texas officials have insisted the buoys are necessary to stop migrants from entering the U.S. illegally, and the state has refuted claims it violated federal law and international treaties when it set up the floating barriers without permission from the Biden administration or Mexico.

    The survey could add a new legal dimension to the Biden administration lawsuit, which argues that Texas violated a longstanding law governing navigable U.S. waterways when it set up the buoys without federal permission.

    Unlawful crossings along the southern border fell to the lowest level in two years in June, a drop the Biden administration attributed to a set of asylum restrictions and programs that allow migrants to enter the U.S. legally.


    I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • livus@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    From the article:

    Nearly 80% of the controversial floating barrier Texas state officials assembled in the middle of the Rio Grande to deter migrant crossings is technically on the Mexican side of the U.S.-Mexico border, according to a federal government survey released on Tuesday.

    The revelation was made public in a federal court filing by the Biden administration in its lawsuit against the barrier, which Texas set up in July as part of an initiative directed by Gov. Greg Abbott to repel migrants and repudiate President Biden’s border policies.

    The river barrier, assembled near the Texas border town of Eagle Pass, has come under national and international scrutiny, including from the Mexican government, which has strongly voiced its objections to the buoys. Advocates, Democratic lawmakers and a Texas state medic have also expressed concerns about the structures diverting migrants to deeper parts of the river where they are more likely to drown. 

    Earlier this month Mexican officials recovered two bodies from the Rio Grande, including one that was found floating along the barrier, but the circumstances of the deaths are still under investigation. Mexican officials condemned the barrier in announcing the discovery of the bodies. But Steve McCraw, director of the Texas Department of Public Safety, said preliminary information indicated that the first person found dead had “drowned upstream from the marine barrier and floated into the buoys.”

    Abbott and other Texas officials have insisted the buoys are necessary to stop migrants from entering the U.S. illegally, and the state has refuted claims it violated federal law and international treaties when it set up the floating barriers without permission from the Biden administration or Mexico. (Article continues)

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      and the state has refuted claims it violated federal law and international treaties when it set up the floating barriers without permission from the Biden administration or Mexico. (Article continues)

      That’s the clincher. States are 100% not allowed to treat internationally or make policies regarding other countries.

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Building a fence has nothing to do with that. If Texas had setup a federal border crossing, that would be illegal. If Texas had that fence constructed in such a way that a federal border crossing were blocked off, that would be illegal. A natural land border augmented with a fence isn’t an international incident and you don’t need permission from the federal government to do that.

        • SterlingVapor@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You sure as hell do when you put 80% of it outside your borders, outside US borders no less

          This kind of thing could spark a war in different circumstances - imagine the Mexican army goes to dismantle the buoys in their borders, and one of several possible groups from Texas confronts them and it leads to a skirmish

          Mexico would be entirely within their rights - it’s on their property and it’s suspected to be leading to deaths

          • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sounds like if the Sovereign Nation of Mexico is as upset about them as you are, they should go remove them.

            • some_guy@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              But

              A natural land border augmented with a fence isn’t an international incident

              • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                The subject of this post is that “nearly 80%” of the border fence is in Mexico’s Sovereign border, so I don’t see the issue with them removing the trespassing part of the fence.

  • Vytle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Guys no one tell the democrats that increased border security dispraportionately benefits mexico over the U.S.

    • natryamar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How so? Is this because it prevent workers from leaving/brain drain?

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Preventing migrant workers has a maybe effect on the jobs that use them, namely farming construction and landscaping. Iirc it was Alabama who banned migrant workers and then had to bus in migrants because they couldn’t keep white folks on the job.