• Amy :3@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Brave, Vivaldi, Edge and other chromium browsers are forks of the main chromium project. They can decide whether to include or exclude features from mainstream chromium.

    As far as I know, Brave and Vivaldi will keep Manifest V2 extension support and said that they will not ship WEI (Web Environment Integrity).

    Discord uses a modified version of electron, and it’s also probably an outdated fork as well, although I am not sure about that.

    Steam, in the other hand, uses CEF, which they use as a way to render it’s interface and as a replacement of VGUI (a good example of this is the steam game overlay), I don’t know if they will ship WEI if it ever releases in chromium as there isn’t a statement from Valve yet.


    Sources:

    If I missed something, please tell me!

    • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      they will not ship WEI

      I don’t really understand how this could work.

      The whole outcry around WEI is that most of the web wouldn’t work if you didn’t have a browser that supported it.

      Not shipping WEI would seem tantamount to just discontinuing.

      • Catweazle@social.vivaldi.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @DogMuffins @amycatgirl, it is not so simple, there are a huge number of third-party pages that also depend on certain Google services, directly or indirectly. This is what happens when you depend on sponsors, because with this you lose your freedom of decision, especially if you make a pact with the devil, sorry, Google.
        Mozilla has already suffered this in its own flesh, becoming a Google mascot from an independent platform, even with Google devs working on Firefox.

    • Scraft161@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Discord’s electron still hasn’t received the patch for spectre/meltdown mitigation in the browser, I doubt they will ever have to deal with manifest V3 or WEI.

  • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s so sad that Presto didn’t get FOSSed.

    Technically it already depended on plenty of FOSS technologies, like gstreamer etc.

    We know this from the leak which allowed to compile a working browser.

    If only it was legally released, it would still be alive, I’m sure of that - there were even patches for the leaked source adding functionality and fixing bugs.

  • Gamey@feddit.rocks
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I just wish Mozilla didn’t just tread Gecko as part of Firefox, the few who tried developing on it came to the conclusion that it’s not sustainable if the engines developer doesn’t give a fuck about you! :/

      • Gamey@feddit.rocks
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, they always did it like that and basically cut all their bigger projects in the massive layoff so I wish they did too but I doubt it :/

    • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Been using FF for about 2 decades now and I have never seen a single good reason to switch.

      • EricKendrick@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ditto. As much as people pretend Firefox is niche, it is the only browser with lineage back to the start of the web.

  • [email protected]@kerala.party
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Firefox is kept alive by Google default search money AFAIK otherwise why don’t they sue google for showing different search results page in firefox

    • drathvedro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, just like slack, spotify, and anything else looking fancy while wasting few gigs of ram to just open. They’re built on electron, which is practically chrome without tabs.

    • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Anything that uses the electron framework uses chromium.

      Although in the case of steam they are using the Chromium Embedded Framework(CEF) to embed the steam store into their interface, as well as to power the steam overlays browser.

      The worst part is, the CEF really is the only way to implement browsers inside other interfaces. OBS uses it too for it’s browser source. There really isn’t any alternatives - if only FF could create it’s own Firefox Embedded Framework to compete, but that’s probably not in the cards due to costs. Mozilla is a not for profit relying on donations and grants.

      And electron is a method for creating desktop app interfaces using website code, it’s used for the interfaces of Discord, slack, teams, Streamlabs (yeah they ripped out the OBS Qt interface and replaced it with electron), and sooo many other modern applications that it’s hard to make track of. And it uses essentially the same thing as CEF at its heart.

      Basically any website can be wrapped in an electron wrapper to produce a standalone desktop app.

  • Rindel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Real talk, if even Steam is Chromium-based, how can I escape? Is there a non- or less-evil, but similar launcher? I’m trying to shift away, but it’s really difficult since everyone I know uses at least one, usually many of those programs.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mozilla doesn’t make it as easy to use the Firefox / Gecko engine in other projects, which doesn’t help for adoption.

    • fuzzzerd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m way out of the loop, but is the issue that they actively make it difficult to use the rendering engine or is it that the cost to modularize it isn’t worth the payoff to Firefox itself? A subtle but important distinction IMO. I always felt it was the second, but maybe I was being dense?

      • planish@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They don’t try to make it difficult, but they make code changes that make it clear they have no concern for anyone who might be trying to use the engine anywhere other than in a retail build of Firefox, without providing things like deprecation warnings or upgrade paths.

    • Aelar64@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you use Firefox nightly (and maybe some of the other beta branches too, I’m not sure), there’s a way to get any extension, they just might not work properly. I haven’t really had issues with nightly, despite it being such a bleeding-edge build - although I would recommend keeping a backup browser since sometimes it decides to just stop working

      • Warrior of Ukraine@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mozilla did say that they’re ready to bring extensions to the main branch and told devs to ready their extensions for mobile support.

        Also Bromite has not been Updated for months, I uninstalled it for that reason.