• azimir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m a Cryptonomicon person. The modern timeline is dated now, but the overall information warfare themes are delicious.

        • azimir@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I have it on the shelf, but haven’t gotten to it. I’ll put it in the reading queue.

  • jabjoe@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s a good read, but he then back on it all and went all Apple. So it’s a bit bitter sweat. Snow Crash is probably better.

    • pbjamm@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I knew quite a few linux fans who went with Apple laptops when OSX came out. At the time it was the best thing available that had unix under the hood which made it really powerful in the right hands.

      • jabjoe@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        If they were more about UNIX than freedom, that could make sense back then. These days, you miss out on loads on of open stuff and are very much a third class citizen. After Linux and Windows, as the platform has neither freedom or a large user base. Macports seams to regularly have talks about how they are shunned and ignored.

  • radamant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Written in 1999

    Never forget that in 2001 he switched to Mac OS X and has been using it since.

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s when Unix (Mach kernel and FreeBSD) based OSX launched. It included command line and OOP development tools that really were a huge improvement over the previous OS 7-9.

      I bought my first Mac a few years later 2003 because I needed a reliable laptop, there was no competition (anyone remember the Sony Viao?) in good laptops, unless you liked thinkpads with one nipple. Plus as a design student, I needed macromedia and Adobe products, and worked in my college’s computer lab managing Mac’s anyway.

  • Veraxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    I am only a few pages in, but speaking as a Linux user in the 2020s, I am skeptical of the claim that Linux in 1999 would “never, ever break down.”

    • azimir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      I was there Gandalf…

      In comparison to the alternatives we had at the time, Linux was a fucking tank. Once it was up, you could expect to get 6 months to years of uptime unless you were installing new tools or changing hardware (no real USB/SATA yet, so hardware was a reboot situation).

      If you got a Win98 machine up, it would eventually just hang. Yes, some could got a whole, but if you used it for general use it would crash the kernel out eventually. Same for MacOS (the OG MacOS).

      The only real completion for stability was other UNIX systems, and few of those were available to the general public at a reasonable price point.

      • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        VAX/VMS was still around then, and as far as I recall, that was the king for uptime.

        Linux back then supported much less hardware. I can remember even in the early aughts, there was while families of popular wireless network chipsets that weren’t supported.

        • azimir@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          VAX/VMS was such a beast! The hardware wasn’t readily available to the public, though.

          Oh, the wireless chipsets in the 90’s into about 2005? or so…that was a bad time for anyone trying to run wireless. Hell, MS Windows didn’t even have network drivers baked in until what, WinXP? Wiring computer together in the 90’s was such a a trial, both for hardware and software fronts.

          I was lucky to score a 3Com 3c905b fast 10/100 Ethernet card from a bussy in 1996. That was well supported across the board (Linux and Windows), and the IRQ settings for the PCI bus memory mapped I/O and IRQs was well documented.

          Edit: buddy, not a hussy, though he kinda was… Your call in how you want to read it.

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hell my home server, running on low end Xeon hardware had uptime numbers around 3 years…then there was a power cut. Next down day was another power cut a year or so later. Total around 8 years running with 5 outages, all but one due to power loss (other was Ubuntu 16.04 - 18.04 upgrade).

      Just updated to Ubuntu server 20.04 so uptime is only 7 days at this point.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Daily updates with rolling distro may cause issues but a stable system that wasn’t tinkered with would run and run and run. Our Linux fileserver at work had a 2 year uptime, only broke that for some drive additions and other adjustments, otherwise it would have just kept on chugging along without interaction. My debian ARM NAS runs without incident, the only shutdowns it sees are when I move equipment to different rooms or want to reroute power cables. Otherwise it would just always be working fine.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Lamina1 is enough to prove Stephenson is kind of full of shit.

    It’s such a joke it doesn’t even have its own Wikipedia entry. It’s just a footnote on Stephenson’s.


    I’m just gonna call it like I sees it:

    I put Stephenson in the same camp as Orson Scott Card.

    He had a single book with some really brilliant and thoughtful ideas… and that’s about it. People need money to stay alive, and can always be swayed by it.