• Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    8 months ago

    The movie came out in 1999. In the movie, they state that it’s 1999 (in the Matrix anyway). Neo is pretty tech savvy and a renowned hacker.

    My assumption is he would’ve used FreeBSD. Or, maybe, Slackware. But I’m leaning more towards BSD.

    • vanderbilt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      Man I wish FreeBSD hadn’t fallen to the wayside. It’s really cohesive and feels put together in a way not Linux distro ever has.

        • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s a GPL point of view. Most BSD users I’ve talked to prefer a more permissive license. Theo said: “GPL fans said the great problem we would face is that companies would take our BSD code, modify it, and not give back. Nope – the great problem we face is that people would wrap the GPL around our code, and lock us out in the same way that these supposed companies would lock us out. Just like the Linux community, we have many companies giving us code back, all the time. But once the code is GPL’d, we cannot get it back. Ironic.”

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            i guess this might be why a lot of processing and storage clusters use it behind closed doors with proprietary code we will never see.

            • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Which is fine with for example OpenBSD, they write “ISC or Berkeley style licences are preferred, the GPL is not acceptable when adding new code, NDAs are never acceptable. We want to make available source code that anyone can use for ANY PURPOSE, with no restrictions. We strive to make our software robust and secure, and encourage companies to use whichever pieces they want to.”

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            And where system is doing better, Linux or BSD? Also the point of the GPL is not to give back. You can have GPL code that is read only and it doesn’t hurt a thing. The point is you can get the code running on your computer and freely make changes to it.

            • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Doing better in what way? Number of installs or being robust and secure? If we go by numbers one could argue that Windows is doing best on the desktop, and that proprietary code therefore is something to strive for. Either way it’s a tangent of the original statement, that the BSD license is a “pushover” license, which I oppose, because the BSD devs are deliberately allowing their code to be used by anyone for any reason.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        You know, I’ve never used it. Maybe I’ll install it in a VM tonight and give it a whirl.

    • zellian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’d argue that he’d use OpenBSD and be running his own firewall, web server, email server, and ftp server.

  • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Realistically, Debian, because it existed when the movie was set.

        • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I am not a big Matrix fan, so maybe my knowledge about the films (I saw 1 and 2, both only once) might be too limited. But I completely fail to understand the symbology.

          • undeffeined@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            From what I can remember, the simbolism is stronger in the first movie and not so much on the other two. I recall two key things that can simbolize the struggle trans people go through or are references to transgenderism.

            • Neo feels that there is something wrong with the world and that he does not belong in it
            • The Character Switch was originally supposed to be a man in the real world and a woman when plugged in to the matrix.

            I’m sure there’s more but it’s been a while since I came across the analysis.

            Worth noting that when I watched the movies I never made an association with transgenderism. I think in great part because I was not even aware of it.

            • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              The Character Switch was originally supposed to be a man in the real world and a woman when plugged in to the matrix.

              This would have been a clear symbol.

              • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                A bit subtle, especially if you weren’t familiar with medicines at the time, but the blue pill is supposed to represent an antidepressant (Prozac was apparently blue at that time, don’t know about now, and was commonly prescribed to closeted trans women instead of actually addressing the core issue), and the red pill HRT (one of the common hormone pills at the time was red)

                Which makes the “redpill” movement extra hilarious.

                As said, though, it was really subtle if you knew that and completely opaque if you didn’t

            • delirious_owl@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              Thanks. That loads but it doesn’t explain how the film is an allegory for transgender. I’d love to read an analysis of the film that breaks down what scenes mean what through that lens

              • undeffeined@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                I see. I watched some video on it a ong time ago so I don’t recall the details. I’m sure you can find something.

    • shastaxc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah he doesn’t distribute it due to privacy and security. He wrote it himself.

      • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Do not try and hack the distro, that’s impossible.

        Instead, only try to realize the truth: there is no distro.

        Then you will realize it isn’t the distro you hack, it is only yourself.