• risencode@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s funny, because getting an ad for Copilot inside my startmenu was actually what made me go back to Linux after 10 years.

    This tracks.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do people actually want this?

    Like, I know the megacorps that control our lives do (since it’s a cheap way of adding value to their products), but what about actual users? I think many see it as a novelty and a toy rather than a productivity tool. Especially when public awareness of “hallucinations” and the plight faced by artists rises.

    Kinda feels like the whole “voice controlled assistants” bubble that happened a while ago. Sure they are relatively commonplace nowadays, but nowhere near as universal as people thought they would be.

    • coolin@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Current LLMs are manifestly different from Cortana (🤢) because they are actually somewhat intelligent. Microsoft’s copilot can do web search and perform basic tasks on the computer, and because of their exclusive contract with OpenAI they’re gonna have access to more advanced versions of GPT which will be able to do more high level control and automation on the desktop. It will 100% be useful for users to have this available, and I expect even Linux desktops will eventually add local LLM support (once consumer compute and the tech matures). It is not just glorified auto complete, it is actually fairly correlated with outputs of real human language cognition.

      The main issue for me is that they get all the data you input and mine it for better models without your explicit consent. This isn’t an area where open source can catch up without significant capital in favor of it, so we have to hope Meta, Mistral and government funded projects give us what we need to have a competitor.

      • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, all that may be true but it doesn’t answer my original concern: Is this something that people want as a core feature of their OS? My comments weren’t that “oh, this is only as technically sophisticated as voice assistants”, it was more “voice assistants never really took off as much as people thought they would”. I may be cynical and grumpy, but to me it feels like these companies are failing to read the market.

        I’m reminded of a presentation that I saw where they were showing off fancy AI technology. Basically, if you were in a call 1 to 1 call with someone and had to leave to answer the doorbell or something, the other person could keep speaking and an AI would summarise what they said when they got back.

        It felt so out of touch with what people would actually want to do in that situation.

        • coolin@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I suppose having worked with LLMs a whole bunch over the past year I have a better sense of what I meant by “automate high level tasks”.

          I’m talking about an assistant where, let’s say you need to edit a podcast video to add graphics and cut out dead space or mistakes that you corrected in the recording. You could tell the assistant to do that and it would open the video in Adobe Premiere pro, do the necessary tasks, then ask you to review it to check if it made mistakes.

          Or if you had an issue with a particular device, e.g. your display, the assistant would research the issue and perform the necessary steps to troubleshoot and fix the issue.

          These are currently hypothetical scenarios, but current GPT4 can already perform some of these tasks, and specifically training it to be a desktop assistant and to do more agentic tasks will make this a reality in a few years.

          It’s additionally already useful for reading and editing long documents and will only get better on this end. You can already use an LLM to query your documents and give you summaries or use them as instructions/research to aid in performing a task.

          • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guess my understanding of an LLM must be way off base.

            I had thought that asking an LLM to edit a video was simply out of scope. Like asking your self driving car to wash the dishes.

    • Awhiskeydrunker@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe I’m a pessimist but this is going to really resonate with the people who are “looking forward to AI” because they read headlines, but haven’t actually used any LLMs yet because nobody has told them how.

    • Uranium3006@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I want a voice controlled assistant that runs locally and is fully FOSS and I can just run on my bog standard linux PC, hardware minimum requirements nonwithstanding

  • const_void@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is the dumbest fucking thing I’ve ever heard of. I’m not buying any keyboard or laptop that has this key. There’s enough Linux-first vendors these days that it’s easy to avoid (Framework, System76, Tuxedo, etc). It’s time to be done with Lenovo and Dell.

    • palordrolap@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the dumbest fucking thing I’ve ever heard of. I’m not buying any keyboard or laptop that has this key.

      Which is exactly what people said about the Windows key.

      Now it’s all but impossible to buy a keyboard that doesn’t have it. Worse, most of us use it without thinking.

      Sure you can call it Super if you like, and even have a Tux key-cap on it, but there used to be a literal gap between the Alt keys and their Ctrl brethren in the lateral directions away from the space bar, and those days are long gone.

      There’ll be the niche users who stick with old keyboards without this new key, just like there are the die-hards who have stuck resolutely to the old IBM keyboards and the like from pre-1995, but if you want a new keyboard?

      Gonna have to shell out a small fortune for a custom build or make do with that dumb new key.

      (Shoutout to the Context Menu key which went as unmentioned in the above as it goes unused in day to day use, despite having been included with its Super cousin since day one.)

      • brax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t see an issue with a “super” key. But what would a copilot key bring that’s of any value? The super key already does everything you’d need.

      • const_void@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Gonna have to shell out a small fortune for a custom build or make do with that dumb new key.

        I don’t think this is true. Just buy a laptop from a company that ships it with Linux. No Windows, no Windows keys. It doesn’t have to be ‘custom’.

        • Keith@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The post mentioned this, and argues that a super a key is basically just a windows key

    • Joker@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t care as long as the placement is ok and I can map it to something useful. I’m a GNOME user so the Windows/Super key gets a lot of use. It’s nice to have. A new key that I use for all my custom shortcuts would actually be kind of nice. Who cares that the default key caps are a Windows icon and this Copilot thing? Change the key caps and they are just keys.

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It depends on how and what you’re measuring. A lot of Linux first, like system 76 and purism, do so e serious work on the firmware and boot systems of their systems. Which for some is a huge value add compared.

    • BaldProphet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I fully agree with you, but Framework is definitely not Linux-first. The only OS they offer preloaded on their laptops is Windows. You have to install Linux yourself if you want it.

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Chatgpt is just Cortana with better marketing. AI isn’t smart, it’s just algorithms producing a facsimile of language via pattern heatmaps. What was Cortana if not just an earlier version of the same thing?

        ““AI”” is all a techbro marketing bubble. Will burst and move on eventually.

        Like holy shit we had the autofill feature in Photoshop ages and ages ago and that’s just doing what the “intelligent” image generators do. We didn’t call it AI back then. All marketing for what amounts to just some interesting algorithms.

        • space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Chatgpt is just Cortana with better marketing. AI isn’t smart, it’s just algorithms producing a facsimile of language via pattern heatmaps. What was Cortana if not just an earlier version of the same thing?

          Well no, not really IMO. Cortana as far as I know wasn’t based on LLMs as we know them today, it was a way older method of NLP. You’re right that on a high level it’s pretty similar but the underlying technology is qualitatively different IMO.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really milking that fad before they inevitably push anything useful behind a monthly paywall.

    • init@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      As long as the ability to manually turn off secureboot and remove the OS isn’t locked behind a subscription…

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why? Win+C launches Copilot already, if you want to use it. It’s simple enough currently, why change it? This will just make everything worse.

  • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t help but think about how Facebook inc rebranded itself to Meta to chase/promote the metaverse fad.

  • flan [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    i dont really understand the revenue model here. i also dont understand how there’s going to be enough computational power to do LLM shit for all windows users all the time? this sounds bad for the environment.

    • Tempy@lemmy.temporus.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Running a pre trained model is much cheaper than training one. But I’d imagine in this case you’ll be sending it over to Microsoft Servers, so they can keep track of everything you ever search so they can better advertise to you.

  • Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    So you can pressed accidentally activating the fucking AI and make the numbers go up so Microsoft can then go and say to investors look millions are using my AI. So annoying.